Private Eye editor Ian Hislop once called it a legal "weapon" deployed by the rich and powerful. But now the lifting of a super-injunction that blocked the reporting of the calamitous Afghan data leak ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. A journalist runs out of the U.S. Supreme Court building carrying a ruling on the last day of the court's term on June 27, 2025, ...

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case involving an executive order that purports to eliminate birthright ...

Today, the Supreme Court will hold a special session to review President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. As John argued at Civitas Outlook, the best reading of the 14 th ...

After more than two hours of oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, it seems that the fate of nationwide injunctions could come down to the votes of two of President Donald Trump's own ...

Supreme Court justices appeared divided on the issue of national injunctions. NPR's Scott Detrow discusses what the Court might do with law professor Nicholas Bagley. During the U.S. Supreme Court's ...

When presidents have tried to make big changes through executive orders, they have often hit a roadblock: A single federal judge, whether located in Seattle or Miami or anywhere in between, could stop ...

<UPDATE 5/19 Just a note to draw readers' attention to the 300+ comments that this post has received. It is a good illustration of one of the things I like most about the VC - I'm not aware of another ...

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Cassandra Burke Robertson, Case Western Reserve University (THE CONVERSATION) When ...

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision along ideological lines on Friday, sided with the Trump administration’s request to limit universal injunctions issued by federal courts. The opinion in the ...

When judges change their mind, they explain their reasons. Or at least they ought to, because that’s what makes their judgments trustworthy. But when the Supreme Court decided Trump v. CASA this term, ...